An Ex-Jihadi in the Arctic

Posted: 15th October 2010 by Thomas Hegghammer in Australia, Converts, Indonesia, Recruitment, training camps

I grew up in the far north of Norway, hundreds of kilometers above the Arctic Circle. As you might expect, my research interests and arctic origin do not intersect very often. Last time was back in 2004 when a plane on the way from my home town Narvik to Bodø was nearly brought down by an axe-swinging Algerian Islamist.

Last Saturday, however, the local newspaper in the nearby city of Tromsø – where I have spent many a drunken night in my youth – broke a remarkable story (hat tip: Tore Bjørgo). It was about Andrew Ibrahim Wenham, a British-Australian convert to Islam who has been living in Tromsø since 2002. The 46-year old Wenham is a respected leader in the local Muslim community and the founding director of the local Alnor mosque.  He is married to a Norwegian convert from Tromsø and leads a quiet existence. However, as the newspaper Nordlys uncovered, Wenham has a somewhat murky past.

In the late 1990s, Andrew Wenham – aka Abu Ismail – was part of a network of Jemaah Islamiyah supporters in Australia. In 1999 he attended a JI training camp in Mindanao and even spent two days alone with JI leader Hambali in Kuala Lumpur. Wenham was friends with Jack Roche, who was arrested in Australia in 2002 for plotting terrorist attacks on behalf of al-Qaida. In April 2000, when Roche returned to Perth after training in al-Qaida camps and meeting Osama bin Ladin in Afghanistan, Wenham greeted Roche at the airport and drove him home.  Wenham’s name appeared several times in the trial against Roche. However, by the time of the 2004 trial, nobody knew what had become of Wenham. In mid-2001 he had left for Yemen, where his trail went cold. Australian terrorism expert Sally Neighbour tells Nordlys that she tried in vain to locate Wenham while researching her book In the Shadow of Swords. Little did she know that Abu Ismail had retreated to the Arctic.

Confronted with the evidence gathered by Nordlys, Wenham confirmed all the details of this story. In an open-hearted newspaper interview, he insists he did not know that his friends in Perth had terrorist connections. He says he went to the Mindanao camp for the adventure and that he did not know who Hambali was. At their Kuala Lumpur meeting, Wenham had the sense that Hambali was assessing him, but the two did not stay in touch. In the spring of 2000, Wenham learned from John Bennett (another convert and member of the Perth network) that Jack Roche was planning to bomb an embassy and assassinate a Jewish leader in Australia. Wenham says he was shocked and told the local imam about the plans, whereupon the imam became furious and called a meeting to dissuade the young men. At this point Wenham decided to break with his friends. In mid-2001 he and his wife Sandra left Australia for Yemen, where they spent 10 months before moving to Tromsø, Sandra’s home town.

Wenham is not a terrorist or an al-Qaida sleeper agent. If he had al-Qaida sympathies, he would have acted on them by now, or at least left a trail of suspicious behaviour or political statements. Wenham’s past activities must be viewed in proper context. His radical dealings occurred before 9/11, before Jemaah Islamiya had carried out any major international terrorist attacks, and before Hambali had risen to fame as a leading al-Qaida associate. Wenham’s departure to Yemen also occurred before the War on Terror, which suggests it was not an attempt to hide an al-Qaida connection. His subsequent silence about his past is obviously somewhat foolish, but perfectly understandable. In the witch-hunt that followed 9/11, many Muslims in the West had their lives ruined for less serious sins than Wenham’s. Andrew Wenham was lucky; had he stayed in Australia he would probably have been sucked into the Roche investigation, and had he gone to America instead of Norway in 2001, he might well have been in prison today.

Wenham’s story is a classic case of socially driven radicalization – what Marc Sageman calls the “bunch-of-guys” phenomenon. Wenham’s arrived in Perth in 1997 shortly after converting to Islam. As a new immigrant and fresh convert, he was on the lookout for new friends. He met fellow convert John Bennett, who introduced him to, well, a bunch of guys in the local Muslim community. The fifteen men socialized extensively; they played paintball together and took religious lessons. A couple of people in the group, the so-called “Ayub brothers”, had connections with Jemaah Islamiyah. After a while, the Ayub brothers suggested to their paintball buddies that they attend a real military training camp in Mindanao. Wenham accepted; “it was like a kind of adventure”, he now says.

As with other youth drawn into radicalism through friends, Wenham’s ideological commitment probably did not run very deep. If he was ideologically committed to anything, it was most likely to a form of “classical jihadism”, i.e. conventional warfare in confined theatres of war where Muslims fight non-Muslim occupying armies. In any case, Wenham broke with his jihadi friends in 2001 and has not done or said anything since to suggest he has radical leanings.

In the interview, Wenham now says he is scared that the latest revelations might cause trouble for his family and damage the reputation of his Tromsø mosque. Unfortunately, his concerns are partly justified. The story has broken at a time when local politicians are debating whether to allow the building a large mosque in Tromsø, to be paid for with a USD 3,3 million gift from a Saudi businessman. The Saudi connection has already made the project controversial, and the Wenham story is not going to help. Let us at least hope Wenham does not suffer too much personally for mistakes made in his youth. Wenham has been an examplary citizen during his time in Tromsø. I wish I could say the same about myself.

 

 

 

  1. John W. Miller says:

    Firstly,

    Permit me to congratulate you and your team on your excellent website. I came to discover jihadica purely by chance. I use Google Chrome as a browser and among the added extras under “gadgets” it is possible via the reader to link to various websites and that was where I discovered yours. For over 30 years, I have been engaged in intelligence work, predominantly counterespionage and if I may say, at a senior level. After retirement, I found myself immersed in counterterrorism, and being a fairly fast learner, I soon became au fait with most of the major terrorist groups around the world. It would be reasonable to say I monitored hundreds of websites on a weekly basis and some daily including those standbys, Jihad Watch, Creeping Sharia, the Rubin report and translations from the Islamic press. I have to admit that the stage that the name I use is my writing identity because I have a legacy of being targeted. In addition to working in intelligence, I’m also a social scientist and one of the rare breed–the rapidly vanishing empirical researcher. I have found my academic training to complement my intelligence work and I am particularly interested in the dynamics of Islamic migrants in Western countries and have been forced to conclude that Samuel Huntington was basically correct when he wrote The Clash of Civilizations back in the late 1980s, firstly in journal form and then the book. It was extremely unfortunate that he died in near penury, supported by a few friends from the academic community, which had repudiated him and subjected his work to the worst ravages of political correctness. It is axiomatic that we face an extraordinarily hard task in convincing governments that the root cause of our current problems lies with immigration and multiculturalism. There have been too many instances of migrants obtaining documents in a new country and then organizing for jihad. The situation appears to be worst in the UK where it has been said that the Pakistani diaspora is seamless with Pakistan. I maintain that although Al Qaeda gets the headlines, Pakistani-based intelligence groups, especially L-e-T draw on an immense reservoir of talent. At present, the Australian parliament is debating for the first time, our commitment to Afghanistan and while there is bipartisan support, forces on the left remain strong and are depicting the US presence as imperialism. We have been lucky in this country that although we have uncovered quite a number of terrorist plots and there have been a substantial number of prosecutions, we have yet to experience the full horror of an attack on home soil. The closest attack yet was in Bali and the number of Australian civilians killed by terrorist attacks from 9/11 to Bali and beyond is quite substantial.

    The latest gambit by opponents of the troop commitment to Afghanistan is to claim that the Taliban is strictly a nationalist force with no intentions beyond the border of that country. There are sufficient references on the Internet and elsewhere of authoritative figures from the Taliban making it abundantly clear that they stand shoulder to shoulder with Al Qaeda in the worldwide struggle against the forces of the infidel/Crusader. There are also disturbing accounts of young Westerners making their way to Pakistan and Afghanistan for training by Al Qaeda and it was no surprise to read Thomas Hegghammer’s “An Ex-Jihadi in the Arctic” of October 15. I have tried to drive home the dangers posed by Jemaah Islamiyah to Australia and my fellow citizens appear to forget that the largest Muslim nation in the world is as close to our northern borders as Cuba to Florida. What a JI operative might be engaged in, up in faraway Tromsø, remains to be seen and I hope my former Swedish colleagues are monitoring his activities with interest. Sleeper agents are not new to Islamic terrorist groups.

  2. John W. Miller says:

    It’s taken long enough for moderators to look at my views. May I respectfully suggest you look for more of my writings at fsm and Sally Neighbour, whom you quote is a journalist with the Australian newspaper, ABC-TV and relies on hand-outs from Sidney Jones of the International Crisis Group. As she is an American woman based in Jakarta, you can reasonably assume that she is hand fed by the Indonesian military, who are doing a fairly good job but the acid test of Indonesian government resolve will come when Abu Bakr Bashir is put on trial.

  3. Raff says:

    Wow John Miller you are a rather public “secret” agent.

    Mr Hegghammer – thanks for the post. Very interesting. I wanted to also ask whether there might be any new news about the AQ linked group in Oslo that you can share?

  4. Thanks Raff. As for the Oslo arrests, the last major development came a few weeks ago when two of the detainees confessed to planning a bomb attack. However, they gave different accounts of what the intended target had been (one said the Chinese embassy in Oslo, the other said the office of Jyllandsposten in Denmark).

  5. A good article, I like it!

  6. John Magne Trane says:

    His concerns?

    “In the interview, Wenham now says he is scared that the latest revelations might cause trouble for his family and damage the reputation of his Tromsø mosque. Unfortunately, his concerns are partly justified. The story has broken at a time when local politicians are debating whether to allow the building a large mosque in Tromsø, to be paid for with a USD 3,3 million gift from a Saudi businessman. The Saudi connection has already made the project controversial, and the Wenham story is not going to help. Let us at least hope Wenham does not suffer too much personally for mistakes made in his youth. Wenham has been an examplary citizen during his time in Tromsø.”

    His concerns?! Personal mistakes… He and most outspokenly, his Norwegian wife Sandra “Maryam” Moe tried to build the grand Arctic mosque, that was supposed to set the current Ishavskatedralen, the landmark of Tromsø, in the shadow.

    The “Saudi businessman” as you say in oh so short words also finances al Qaida activities. The couple and the “businessman” have, after not succeding in making (or rather expanding) a jihadi mosque, been successful in building one in Iceland.

    They have also close extremist connections, where they get hate preachers from the moslem world, the US and the UK to come to Tromsø and teach the local moslems to hate homosexuals, women and “disbelievers”. It is a strange experience when a complete hall applauds an islamist who calls for the execution of Norwegians, on Norwegian soil.

    They also have close connections to the islamist segregating community of Norway in the teaching places like the University of Tromsø, where they pushed for the niqab to be used, and accused a (naturally not agreeing) professor of “racism”.

    What is this? An islamistic apologist site?