New AQIM abduction cases

In mid-December 2008, UN special envoy to Niger, Robert Fowler, and his aide, Louis Guay, mysteriously disappeared while on a field trip. The fate of the two Canadians long remained shrouded in uncertainty. A Nigerian Tuareg rebel group first claimed responsibility for their abduction, but this claim was quickly retracted. In early February Canadian authorities received a video tape from unknown sources which confirmed the two diplomats were still alive, and demanded a prisoner swap for their release. Last Wednesday, al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb released an online statement in which it claimed responsibility not only for the abduction of Fowler and Guay, but also that of four European tourists who disappeared from the Mali-Niger border area in late January.

The latest statement is brief and raises as many questions as it answers. It names and depicts the four tourists (one Briton, one German and two Swiss), but offers no indications of their approximate geographical whereabouts, nor on whether the six hostages are held together. The statement includes no specific demands, but states that the hostages are held as prisoners under the shari‘a law and that conditions for their release will be given at a later time.

These two recent cases resemble the kidnapping case of two Austrian tourists last year in several respects (see also here). They were abducted by AQIM elements in Tunisia in February, then taken to Mali and held there until released for a ransom in October.

First, all three cases illustrate AQIM’s extended geographical reach. While the Austrian operation involved Tunisian, Algerian, (possibly Libyan), and Malian territory, the two latest cases represent the first AQIM incursions into Niger (officially, at least). It has been speculated that local Tuareg groups in Niger executed the abductions, and then handed the hostages over to AQIM in Mali or Algeria, but the statement affirms that the operations were carried out by “mujahideen” (which normally refers to AQIM’s own elements). Whether the AQIM presence is direct or indirect, it has significant operational implications.

Second, the current cases echo the Austrian abduction through the confusing set of messages and demands presented by the captors. In the Austrian case, the AQIM first demanded the release of members imprisoned in Algeria and Tunisia. They then changed the request to include two Muslims imprisoned on terrorism charges in Austria, before settling on a ransom. It is not clear whether this evolution reflected a lack of internal coordination, a poor negotiation strategy or simply the unrealistic nature of the initial demands.

Nevertheless, in economic terms, kidnapping has proved profitable for AQIM lately. In this regard, it should be noted that abductions have long been a favoured tactic of AQIM (and GSPC before it). Most victims in the past have tended to be wealthy Algerians kidnapped for money. Third, then, the three recent cases illustrate the increase in anti-Western activity by AQIM. Algeria and Mauritania in particular have experienced a rise in attacks on foreign interests and nationals. The latest abduction cases indicate that this now also applies to other countries in the region.

Finally, if these new cases follow the pattern of the Austrian affair, we will hear more from the captors soon. In any case let us hope for a more rapid release than last time, when the  hostages were held for over eight months. To be continued.

Document (Arabic): 02-18-09-aqim-abduction-un-representatives-and-european-tourists

Filed under:
Share this:
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on telegram
Share on email
Share on print

2 Responses

  1. Thanks, Hanna, for the excellent analysis.

    I’m curious to know if you’ve seen any grumbling in the fora about AQIM’s tactics in this regard, or whether there has been any discernible reaction to these tactics by AQ-Central. The descent into (or continuing practice of, from GSPC days) criminality like kidnapping for ransom, for which there is no clear warrant in the ideological universe of AQ-Central, has been a divisive issue for AQ affiliates in the past. Abu Sayyaf’s degeneration into a kidnapping business, and earlier Algerian groups’ rapacious and seemingly purposeless bloodletting in Algeria, has drawn criticism from AQ-Central figures in the past and has led to a distancing of their respective relationships. Given the importance of GSPC as an upholder of the AQ “brand,” are you currently seeing anything like this with regard to the spate kidnappings?

    Many thanks,


  2. Thanks, Vahid – that is a good question. I have actually not seen any critical comments about kidnapping as a tactic on the jihadi fora. There has been, as you mention, criticism against the indiscriminate killing of civilians, both in the past and more recently (especially following the wave of high casualty suicide operations that started in April 2007). During the last month, for instance, there has been a series of critical comments on the French language forum Minbar-SoS (http://www.minbar-sos.com/forum/al_qaida/), in which a member named ‘algerianmuslim’ has questioned the rationale for attacking civilians, and in one posting also apparently disapproves of the reported kidnapping of a shepherd. (Note that these postings have led other members to suggest ‘algerianmuslim’ is a spy.) As for reactions by AQ Central, I have seen nothing but support to the AQIM, yet nothing specifically on the kidnapping cases.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Latest Jihadica