jihadica

chronicling the global jihad

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

Sayf al-`Adl a Nobody

July 26, 2011 by Will McCants 2 Comments

Shmukh forum user Amal wa-Alam complains that the brothers are disparaging Sayf al-`Adl, the operational leader of al-Qaeda.  “They are beginning to talk about him as if he is a nobody.” Amal strongly disagrees and adduces as evidence West Point’s study of his handiwork in Africa that Clint Watts, Jake Shapiro, and Vahid Brown had a hand in. “It’s strange that the Americans know” and the brothers do not.

It’s not clear who these naysaying brothers are, and another Shmukh user disagrees with Amal, saying that he has heard no disparaging remarks. But if it is true that Sayf is being criticized in some jihadi circles as irrelevant, it is quite a change from the rumors two months ago that he was the acting head of al-Qaeda after Bin Laden’s death.

This isn’t the first time that jihadi leaders have referenced the studies of American and European analysts to bolster their authority. This latest post underlines once again that jihadism is not a static phenomenon but one influenced by those who study it and vice versa.

 

Filed Under: AQ Leadership, Western Analysts

About Will McCants

« Breivik and Al-Qaeda
Strategic Theory of the Second Generation of Jihadis »

Comments

  1. ٌRafiq al-Akhdar says

    July 26, 2011 at 11:06 pm

    Those rumors about Saif were spread only in the Western press.

    Reply
  2. Mr. Orange says

    July 27, 2011 at 8:18 am

    There was a thread on Shumûkh about this recently. The threadstarter posted an article which I suppose had its origin in the Egyptian press. The article’s claim was that Sayf al ‘Adil doesn’t exist and is a ghost created by Western intelligence or Western media. The “Makkâwî mistake” was cited as evidence.

    The forum community answered that Sayf was a real and well known AQC operative and that contrary to the article’s claim he had indeed been mentioned before UBL’s death. The conspiracy theories about al-Zarqâwî that also said he wasn’t real were cited as counter-argument.

    This may be the reason for the complaining post you mentioned. In fact I was surprised how nice the posters treated the thread-starter. The one you saw seems to be somewhat more pissed. Unfortunately I can’t find the thread – it may have been deleted. While searching for it I saw quite some threads about Sayf. It seems like they try to convince possible doubters of his “realness” – his words on al-Zarqâwî were posted for example.

    Regards,

    Mr. Orange

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

“… an obsessive and multilingual crew who monitor and debate terrorist Web statements like Talmudic scholars poring over a manuscript” – New York Times

Recent Posts

  • Caliph Incognito: The Ridicule of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi November 14, 2019
  • How Did the Islamic State Pick Its New Leader? November 1, 2019
  • Mourning Morsi: The Death of an Islamist and Jihadi Divisions September 27, 2019
  • Kill the Caliph! The Islamic State’s evolution from an integrated to a fragmented group May 20, 2019
  • Divine Test or Divine Punishment? Explaining Islamic State Losses March 11, 2019

Categories

Copyright © 2019 - jihadica | design by WPStuffs